Neighbors of the shipyard attended February’s
Regional Board meeting, prepared to tell the Board how pollution from
shipbuilding activities has impacted their use of the Bay.
However, the Regional Board granted NASSCO a
one-month extension to their appeal, threatening the community’s chances
to share their input. Because the March meeting was scheduled to take
place in Temecula, most community members could not afford to take the day
off to travel to the meeting. To address this problem, EHC videotaped
community testimony and presented it to the Regional Board.
NASSCO Takes No Responsibility
NASSCO attorneys took an adversarial tone,
cross-examining community members who had given testimony and arguing that
the toxic discharges had no effect on the health of the Bay.
"Without any credible evidence, NASSCO’s paid
scientist testified that more than 400,000 gallons of toxic storm water
has zero impact on the Bay," said Capretz. "I wonder how the
marine life in the Bay would respond to this outrageous assertion?"
The Regional Board was not swayed by NASSCO’s
arguments and enforced the terms of the storm water discharge permit by
levying this fine. NASSCO and Continental Maritime had challenged the
original shipyard storm water discharge permit; however a San Diego
Superior Court Judge upheld the tough pollution controls in October 1999.
Sediment Cleanup Delayed
San Diego Bay is one of the crown jewels of San
Diego. But its beauty is tarnished by what lies beneath its surface.
A host of toxic chemicals including copper, zinc,
mercury, PCBs, petroleum solvents, oil and grease, and pesticides lurk at
the bottom of the Bay. Most of the contaminated sediments are offshore the
commercial shipyards and 32nd Street Naval Station.
On Feb. 21, the Regional Board was slated to adopt
sediment cleanup levels for San Diego’s three major commercial shipyards
— NASSCO, Southwest Marine and Continental Maritime. But rather than
establish levels during its February meeting, the Board ordered the
shipyards to perform sediment sampling that will be reviewed by Regional
Board staff. The Board will then hold a public hearing to review the
findings and take testimony on the issue before establishing cleanup
levels.
The shipyards are fighting for levels that will
provide minimal cleanup and will leave a substantial amount of
contamination in the Bay. These levels are not protective and would allow
impacts to marine life to continue after the cleanup. This was borne out
by the opinion of two of the scientists evaluating the issue on the
regional board’s independent three-member review panel (the third
scientist was named to the panel by the shipyards). They contended that
the evidence did not support leaving high levels of toxic chemicals in the
Bay.
The shipyards also argue that the expense of
removing all of the contaminated sediments is prohibitive. But their
recent profits and lucrative contracts tell a different story. San Diego’s
shipyards are experiencing a time of unprecedented economic prosperity and
stability. NASSCO recently received a contract worth $630 million.
Southwest Marine was just awarded two multiyear contracts worth $155
million for repair and maintenance on Navy ships.
"For these wealthy companies — all owned by
mega-corporations outside San Diego — to advocate for minimal cleanup is
shameful and demonstrates poor corporate citizenship. They have profited
from operations that wash toxic chemicals into our Bay without having to
pay for the damage done to our public resource," said Capretz.
"They continue to abuse the community’s generosity in allowing them
to utilize the Bay by degrading its health."
Contaminated sediments poison fish and can threaten
human health as the chemicals travel up the food chain. San Diego Bay has
been posted for 10 years with warnings about eating Bay fish because of
elevated levels of mercury, PCBs and arsenic.
The establishing of sediment cleanup levels will set
the stage for all future cleanup actions, including cleanup at the five
"toxic hot spots" identified by the state in San Diego Bay.
These five areas — 7th Street Channel, Evans Street Channel, Broadway
Street Pier and the mouths of Chollas Creek and Switzer Creek — are so
severely contaminated that the Regional Board intends to pursue cleanups
at these sites next. The amount of contamination that will be removed will
be determined by the levels set at the shipyards.
"The Regional Board must set in place the most
stringent sediment cleanup levels so all contamination caused by the
shipyards is removed," said Capretz. "Let’s not invest money
in a partial cleanup only to discover in a few years that it wasn’t good
enough. "The Regional Board also should order the shipyards to begin
this cleanup as soon as possible and not let the process drag on
indefinitely. As long as the contaminated sediments remain in the Bay,
marine life is harmed," said Capretz.