Truck case 'dumps' on local
communities
If you stand at the corner of Cesar E.
Chavez Parkway and Newton Avenue in Barrio Logan on a typical weekday
morning, you might not be able to see to the other side, much less find a
safe way to cross the Parkway. Tractor-trailer trucks, dozens of them,
line the street as they make their way to and from the industrial
waterfront and Interstate-5.
Children are forced to dodge these trucks
every morning on their way to school. In addition to the obvious safety
issues, there are the toxic fumes to contend with. Think of how much you
hate to be stuck in traffic behind a diesel truck or bus belching black
smoke. Now think about breathing the fumes created by more than 20 diesel
vehicles in a row, and remember that diesel exhaust has been blamed by the
state for more than two-thirds of the cancer risk in urban air.
So who should have the authority to decide
whether those trucks should be allowed to use the Parkway or any
residential or commercial street? Who should have the authority to
restrict traffic, especially large truck traffic, for reasons of safety in
residential neighborhoods? For more than a year, Environmental Health
Coalition has been working with local residents to re-route trucks from
the Parkway. Most of the trucks are coming from the Port District’s
Tenth Avenue Terminal and using the Parkway, formerly Crosby Street, to
enter and exit I-5. The Port District has talked with EHC, community
residents, and the City of San Diego about re-routing options.
However, if a recent court case is not
overturned on appeal, none of these efforts will bear fruit because no
local agency will have the authority to prohibit trucks from using any
highway or local road, including those streets that exclusively serve
residential neighborhoods.
You might be surprised to learn that you
would need to pass a State law to restrict truck traffic on local streets.
This is the result of a recent court decision, California Dump Truck
Owners Association v. Gray Davis, in which dump truck owners claimed that
provisions of California law that allow local governments to regulate
trucks conflict with the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization
Act. The FAAA Act, which purportedly deregulated the airline industry,
also prohibits any regulation of the price or route of the transportation
of goods, except safety regulations adopted by a State. Thus, according to
this interpretation of the FAAA Act, it will take an act of the California
Legislature to get the trucks off Cesar Chavez Parkway or any other
street, including those that are adjacent to schools.
An example is Beardsley Street, which runs
along one edge of Perkins Elementary School in Barrio Logan and is
currently closed to truck traffic. Because of this ruling, it could be
re-opened as another route to the terminal.
The decision of the court in the Dump Truck
case represents the latest distortion of the concept of deregulation. This
severe restriction on the power of local authorities to promote safe
streets and neighborhoods must not be allowed to stand.
EHC joins with the California League of
Cities in urging local municipalities to challenge this decision before
the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. We urge the City of San Diego and the
Port District to join this challenge in order to preserve their ability to
provide safe streets for San Diego residents.
Common sense tells us that local
communities should have control over planning issues that affect their
health and safety. To restrict community members’ rights to protect
themselves is unjust, unfair, and counterproductive to the progress made
toward allowing residents to create the kind of neighborhoods in which
they want to live and raise their children.
|