Activists
in Military Toxics Project Fight to Protect
Community, Veteran Health:
EHC
and Impacted Communities Demand Military
Environmental Responsibility
What do a worker in Texas, a
mother in Tennessee, a Yu’pik elder in Alaska,
an activist in Puerto Rico, a veteran in Wisconsin
and a retiree in California have in common? All
are neighbors of U.S. military bases and
operations. And all are suffering serious health
and safety consequences as a result.
Negative effects of military base operations on
neighboring residents and veterans are wide
ranging and sometimes deadly. Military base
neighbors suffer increased cancer risks from air
toxics, pollution of drinking water basins, high
body burdens of radioactive and toxic
constituents, exposure to chemical weapons
releases, threats from unexploded ordnance and
safety threats from incinerators and nuclear
reactors close to heavily populated areas.
Many people no longer are willing to pay the
high cost of living next to military operations.
They are organizing and fighting back.
In 1990, Environmental Health Coalition became
a founding member of the Military Toxics Project,
joining with other grassroots organizations to
reduce the impacts of military operations and
pollution on neighboring residents. The project
now represents 400 community organizations, Native
American tribes, veterans groups and individuals
with the common purpose to promote cleanup,
compliance and pollution prevention by U.S.
military bases and contractor facilities.
"The military is like no other
polluter," said Laura Hunter, Director of EHC’s
Clean Bay Campaign. "It operates outside of
democracy, it operates in secret, and it is immune
from many environmental laws,"
In November, EHC hosted a conference of the MTP
Base Contamination Network. At a People’s
Congressional Hearing on Nov. 11, local elected
and appointed officials heard public comment on
the Military Environmental Responsibility Act (MERA),
proposed federal legislation that would require
military compliance with the same environmental
and safety laws as other entities. Project members
in attendance shared stories of the effects of
nearby military operations on their communities.
As reported in the last issue of the
Toxinformer, a poll conducted for EHC by the San
Diego State University Social Science Research
Laboratory showed 66 percent of San Diegans favor
holding the Navy to the same environmental
protection laws and guidelines required of other
industries. Pursuant to this goal, EHC has worked
with U.S. Congressman Bob Filner to draft MERA. If
approved, the legislation would remove military
immunity and exemptions from federal and state
environmental and safety laws.
"We have had great success in this nation
in the 1970s and 80s enacting environmental
laws," Filner said. "And yet it turns
out the military, one of the biggest, most
economically powerful and most capable
organizations of doing damage to the environment,
is not subject to these laws.’
Pedro Nava of the California Coastal Commission
and Imperial Beach Councilmember Patricia McCoy
joined Filner for the November hearing. Nava
learned about the impacts of nuclear aircraft
carriers and the commission’s inability to
regulate the military at a series of public
hearings held earlier this year. He was impressed
by the deep commitment and thorough research of
the many community members who testified
concerning the need for increased protection.
"I’m concerned about the risks we impose
on working-class people in the name of military
preparedness," Nava said. "I’m
concerned that we don’t require of the military
the same care that we demand of businesses."
McCoy knows only too well the arrogance of the
Navy when it comes to dealing with local
communities. In 1999, the first of hundreds of
planned truckloads of contaminated bay sediments
dredged to allow nuclear aircraft carriers into
San Diego Bay already had arrived in Imperial
Beach for disposal before any local authority was
notified. Fast action on the part of the City
Council exposed this travesty to the media and the
Navy, facing a public relations nightmare,
reversed its decision.
"I think the thing that gives me most
pause for concern is this growing disrespect and
disconnect for the land that nurtures all of us. I
don’t care where you are, in corporate America
or in the struggles of poverty, we’re all in
this place together and we have an obligation to
the land and all other living creatures to restore
what we have done," McCoy said. "We don’t
want the military to poison the very people they
are supposed to be protecting."
Puerto Rico: Can Peace and Justice Come to
Vieques?
For many decades, the U.S. Navy has occupied
most of the Puerto Rican island of Vieques, using
it for live bombing practice and other activities.
But Vieques is not an abandoned island; it is home
to 9,000 of Puerto Rico’s poorest residents.
Years of military exercises, including the
recently discovered use of depleted uranium
ordnance, have caused serious negative effects on
the health and quality of life of the people of
Vieques.
After the killing of a civilian worker by a
Navy bomb last year, the movement to end the U.S.
military presence on the island intensified.
Robert Rabin, keynote speaker for the November
conference, coordinated the Peace and Justice Camp
that occupied the Naval bombing range and led to a
temporary suspension of military exercises.
Officials arrested 216 demonstrators on the
bombing range in May. Protesters have re-entered
the bombing range numerous times since then,
resulting in about 1,000 more arrests.
"The committee for the rescue and
development of Vieques strongly supports the
Military Environmental Responsibility Act as a
mechanism to end military irresponsibility in
relation to the environment and the health of
people close to their facilities," Rabin
said. "In Vieques, we struggle for
demilitarization, decontamination, return of the
land and a future, sustainable,
community-controlled economic development. The
healthy use of Vieques land to be taken back by
our community depends on the level of
environmental cleanup the Navy is forced to carry
out before leaving."
Memphis, Tennessee: Closed Defense Depot Opens
Community Nightmare
When Doris Bradshaw’s grandmother died of a
unique form of cancer, Doris wondered why.
Increasing numbers of women in her neighborhood
were suffering miscarriages and kidney diseases.
Babies were being born with birth defects and
girls as young as 15 were being diagnosed with
cancer. Something was wrong.
Bradshaw, now board chair of the MTP,
investigated what was so "unique" about
her neighborhood environment. What she found was
shocking. The Department of Defense had operated a
secret chemical warfare weapons depot in the heart
of this black residential community. The local
high school stands directly adjacent to a ditch
that drained contaminants from the depot.
"The Defense Department in Memphis does
not address health issues. And they’ve told us
that we cannot be moved away from the site,"
Bradshaw said.
These exposure were not all from past military
operations. Recently, the military released a
toxic chemical weapons gas into the community.
Neighbors were not notified of the release for
almost 10 days. Residents said the failure to
report the release to the general public is just
the latest example of environmental racism.
"There are people who live 15 feet from
were they’re removing mustard gas bombs without
an emergency escape plan," Bradshaw said.
"This is criminal."
St. Lawrence Island, Alaska: Abandoned Barrels,
Abandoned Responsibility.
Annie Alowa died last year, the fourteenth
person in her village to succumb to cancer. A
photo of this Native American health worker
standing amidst thousands of barrels abandoned by
the U.S. Military in the Aleutian Islands told a
story of contamination and abandonment. Alowa, a
Yu’pik elder in the community of Savoonga,
served as a health aide in her village for 25
years. She campaigned for the military to clean up
the area it extensively contaminated at Northeast
Cape along the coast of the Bering Sea on Saint
Lawrence Island.
The contamination of this area from military
operations is wide-spread. Savoonga village elders
say the stream near the community, once one of the
richest fish streams on Saint Lawrence Island, has
been barren in the 30 years since the military
began poisoning it.
"Alaska is perceived as remote," said
Janet Daniels, a spokeswoman for
the Alaska Community Action on Toxics. "The small
populations of isolated communities lack the
political clout to resist the intrusion or to
force proper cleanup.
Before the military occupied Northeast Cape,
people maintained fishing and hunting camps or
lived there year round. Within a nine square-mile
radius, Army Corps of Engineers contractors have
identified at least 23 contaminated sites that
require environmental investigation and cleanup.
Identified contamination includes fuel spills
totaling more than 220,000 gallons, solvents,
heavy metals, asbestos and PCBs. A military
contractor estimated that one of the barrel dumps
contained more than 29,500 buried drums. The
military left several other large barrel dumps,
landfills and a building complex with extensive
fuel and chemical contamination.
"The very same people who spent so much
time, energy and money to prepare to defend the
citizens are the very same people whose lack of
foresight has caused contamination of food and
water sources for many native communities, causing
long-term adverse health effects and terminal
illnesses," Daniels said. "The
Department of Defense must be held accountable for
their actions."
San Antonio, Texas: Does Air Force Pollution
Violate Civil Rights?
When Community Health Team members surveyed
homes in North Kelly Gardens, a largely Latino
community in San Antonio, Texas, the results were
staggering. Ninety-one percent of adults and 79
percent of children surveyed were suffering
multiple illnesses. Residents suffered high
incidences of neurological disorders, respiratory
problems and elevated blood lead levels.
Many pointed to nearby Kelly Air Force Base as
a potential cause. A plume of toxic contamination
extends more than four miles beyond the base and
underlies 20,000 homes in North Kelly Gardens and
nearby neighborhoods. Other toxic sites include
unlined disposal pits for chromium plating sludge
wastes and low level radioactive waste sites.
Kelly AFB also is a major source of air pollution
in San Antonio due to the large number of
military-industrial facilities operating on the
base, which emit more than one million pounds of
air pollutants each year.
The SW Public Worker’s Union filed a Title VI
complaint, alleging that pollution of Latino
neighborhoods near Kelly AFB violated residents’
civil rights. The union has instituted a training
program for young organizers and completed their
own health surveys of the community to raise
awareness of the health impacts on residents from
Kelly AFB contamination.
San Diego, CA: Navy Impacts Neighboring
Residents
Marilyn Field had no idea of the true
nature of her "neighbors" when she
retired to Coronado in 1995. What she has learned
since has her fighting for her health and safety
every day.
San Diego is home to the largest military
complex in the world, which is getting bigger and
more dangerous. The Naval presence occupies
181,000 acres of San Diego County and includes
eight bases, 120 commands and more than one-third
of the Pacific Fleet. Past Naval activity in the
region has been responsible for bombs on local
beaches and 100 toxic waste sites. Now, six more
nuclear reactors (two per Naval aircraft carrier)
are coming into San Diego Bay, adding the emission
of hundreds of tons of air pollution and creating
new depository for radioactive waste.
Working with activists like Field, EHC is
fighting for adequate protection in the event of
an accident. There have been 14 documented
accidental releases of radiation associated with
Naval reactors. The Navy has released radioactive
coolant water into San Diego Bay and in the past,
researchers found levels of radioactive cesium-137
at almost ten times background near bases with
ported nuclear vessels. Further, Naval reactor
safety systems depend more on operator controlled
systems than do commercial reactors, making them
more susceptible to human error.
"If there were a radioactive release in my
neighborhood today, there would be no way to
notify residents of San Diego or other bay-side
communities like Imperial Beach," Field said.
"There are no evacuation plans, there are no
sirens and there has been no community education
effort."
|